Sign In or Join your business

Blog entrysee all posts

Enfield local plan

Enfield Local Plan Update: What the Planning Inspector Has Said and What Happens Next

A straightforward guide to the key changes, protected Green Belt sites and what happens next in Enfield’s planning future

Major changes proposed to Green Belt sites, housing plans and development across Enfield The future of Enfield’s Local Plan has taken a significant step forward after the independent Planning Inspector published his latest advice following months of public hearings and examination.

Enfield local plan

The document runs to more than 36 pages and covers everything from housing targets and Green Belt land to employment sites, transport, biodiversity and town centres.

While the report contains a huge amount of technical planning detail, the key message is simple:

The Local Plan has not yet been approved.

Instead, the Inspector has told Enfield Council that a number of important changes must be made before he can decide whether the plan is legally compliant and “sound.”

What Is The Local Plan?

The Local Plan is the document that will guide where homes, jobs, schools, parks, transport improvements and major developments are built across Enfield between now and 2041.

It affects:

  • Green Belt land
  • Housing developments
  • Employment sites
  • Town centres
  • Community facilities
  • Open spaces
  • Biodiversity and nature
  • Transport and infrastructure

Once adopted, it becomes one of the most important planning documents in the borough.

The Biggest Headlines

  1. Some Green Belt Land Could Be Saved

One of the most significant findings relates to proposed development around Crews Hill.

The Inspector says several areas currently proposed for removal from the Green Belt should remain protected because there is insufficient justification for removing them.

This includes:

  • Kings Oak Plain
  • Parts of Crews Hill Golf Course
  • Sections of railway corridor land
  • Parts of the Glasgow Stud area
  • Land around Theobalds Park Road where no development is currently planned

In simple terms:

If development isn’t planned on a piece of land, the Inspector says there is often no reason to remove it from the Green Belt.

This could mean considerably more Green Belt protection than originally proposed.

  1. Two Proposed Development Sites Should Be Removed Completely

The Inspector has recommended that two controversial allocations should be deleted from the Local Plan altogether.

Camlet Way / Crescent Way (Hadley Wood)

The Inspector concludes:

  • The harm to the Green Belt would be too great.
  • The character of the area would be significantly affected.
  • The benefits do not outweigh the damage.

Recommendation:

Remove the site from the Local Plan and keep it in the Green Belt.

Land East of Junction 24 (M25)

The proposed employment site near Junction 24 also faces removal.

The Inspector found:

  • Very high Green Belt harm.
  • Significant impact on rural character.
  • Questions around access and neighbouring properties.
  • Benefits do not outweigh the harm.

Recommendation:

Delete the allocation and return the land fully to the Green Belt.

  1. Whitewebbs Golf Course Allocation Should Be Removed

The Inspector has also recommended removing several controversial “Rural Enfield” allocations including:

  • Whitewebbs Golf Course
  • Picketts Lock
  • Tottenham Hotspur Training Ground land
  • Sloeman’s Farm

Importantly, this does not affect existing planning permissions.

Instead, the Inspector believes the policies themselves are unclear and ineffective.

  1. Crews Hill and Chase Park Remain in the Plan

Despite recommending changes to several Green Belt boundaries, the Inspector has not rejected the larger strategic developments at:

  • Crews Hill
  • Chase Park

However, he wants much tighter controls over:

  • Building heights
  • Housing densities
  • Biodiversity protection
  • Heritage impacts
  • Transport infrastructure
  • Green Belt boundaries

In effect:

The developments remain under consideration, but the rules around them may become much stricter.

  1. Housing Targets Stay Largely Intact

Although some sites may be removed or reduced in size, the Inspector says Enfield still appears capable of meeting its housing requirements.

This means:

  • The overall housing strategy remains broadly intact.
  • The borough is still expected to deliver significant numbers of new homes.
  • The housing trajectory will need updating.
  1. More Protection For Nature

The Inspector raises repeated concerns about:

  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs)
  • Ancient woodland
  • Wildlife corridors
  • Biodiversity impacts

Several policies will need strengthening to ensure:

  • Development avoids sensitive habitats.
  • Larger biodiversity buffers are provided.
  • Important ecological sites remain protected.
  1. Biodiversity Net Gain Reduced

One surprising recommendation concerns Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG).

Enfield had proposed requiring developers to provide a minimum of 20% biodiversity net gain.

The Inspector says national guidance does not currently justify going beyond the national requirement.

This means the requirement is likely to fall back to:

10% Biodiversity Net Gain

unless stronger evidence can be provided.

  1. New HMO Policy Required

The Inspector says Enfield’s Local Plan currently lacks a clear policy covering:

Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs)

He has instructed the Council to introduce a specific HMO policy to manage:

  • Clustering
  • Residential amenity
  • Parking
  • Quality standards
  1. Traveller Site Needs Increased

Updated evidence suggests Enfield needs:

  • At least 30 permanent pitches
  • 1 transit site

The Council is preparing a separate Traveller Local Plan to address this.

What Happens Next?

Enfield Council must now:

  1. Draft all of the required changes.
  2. Update supporting studies.
  3. Publish a schedule of proposed modifications.
  4. Carry out a public consultation.
  5. Submit responses back to the Inspector.

Only after this process is completed will the Inspector issue his final report.

What Does This Mean For Residents?

The key takeaway is that the Local Plan is still very much a work in progress.

The Inspector has:

  • Supported parts of the overall strategy.
  • Accepted the need for housing growth
  • Allowed major sites such as Chase Park and Crews Hill to continue being considered.

But he has also:

  • Recommended keeping more land in the Green Belt.
  • Recommended deleting several development allocations.
  • Required stronger protection for nature and heritage.
  • Asked for significant policy changes before the plan can be approved.

Read The Full Inspector’s Letter

Residents who would like to read the full document can view the Inspector’s post-hearing advice letter through the Enfield Local Plan examination process:

Enfield Local Plan Examination Documents⁠

You can also watch The Leader Of Enfield Council - Cllr Alessandro Georgiou’s video here

The Enfield Society also has a dedicated page covering the local plan

23 March – To view the hearing sessions held on 18 and 19 March, visit YouTube:

Published: June 16, 2026